Smaller textDefault textEnlarge Text
|
PDF
|
E-mail
|
Print

More Partners at the Family Table

 

Partnership in Mission

We invite you to join the conversation on partnership in mission.

Valdir Steuernagel starts the conversation in an interview More Partners at the Family Table.

Selected writers respond:

Also see a video introduction to the issue and more on the topic from around the web.

Join in the conversation by Adding Your Response.



Interview with Valdir Steuernagel

Valdir SteuernagelHow do we serve one another in a diverse global Church?

World mission needs partnership - across national boundaries, between different cultures, and between rich and poor. How do we work together effectively in ways that respect our differences? How do we partner so the rich and powerful don’t overwhelm the weak? How do we partner to give honor to God through loving “family” relations? Tim Stafford talks with Valdir Steuernagel, a Brazilian pastor and theologian whose role in World Vision gives him wide exposure to the global church.

Q: Why does partnership matter?

Both Jesus and Paul tell us clearly that the gospel message is a message of community. It's never an individual enterprise. We are called to preach the gospel and do good, and we are called to be a community of the gospel.

Something beautiful is that God himself is community: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. And Jesus prayed for us to be a community. The Trinity models for us how to get along, how to be interdependent, how to keep our own specificity without the sense of competition.

We are not talking about a pragmatic modus operandi. Partnership is a gospel mandate, which must be expressed in how we relate to each other in a global community. Evangelicals are not very good at that. We look at it through the lenses of pragmatists. We use the word “cooperation” more than “community.”

Q: “Cooperation” suggests a high level of individual autonomy.

It’s pragmatism: you put on the table what you have, and we’ll see how we can work together. Instead, we should start with being family.

Q: Are there unique challenges to partnership today?

Certainly. In the past our eyes were focused on the European and American missionaries. Today there are many more players at the table, each with their own particularity. It’s important for us to discern our own experiences, to understand each other, so we serve well together.

Western missionaries brought tremendous gifts. North Americans came out of an experience of church growth and revival, with positive stories to share. They brought optimism and a can-do spirit. They could say here it is, you do this. And they brought money. 

Today it’s no longer like that. One key question is how the North American mission enterprise serves in mission while no longer calling the shots. When you come to the table today, you have for example the Koreans, and they will say “We do it our way.”

Q: Or they will just do it.

Exactly. Then we have Brazilians who will say, “Look, we can do our own thing.” This is both good and bad. When I was a young guy, we could say everything is the fault of the Americans: “Yankee go home.” Today I cannot say this, because Brazil too has developed its own empires.

This is good, because today we can point to Pueblos Musulmanes International, a Latin American mission that works in Islamic cultures with great ability and years of experience. They don’t ask the North Americans how to do it, they just do it. That’s good.

It’s also bad. My wife and I visited Zambia, and our hosts took us to see the huge Faith Cathedral. It was due for inauguration in a few days. We were driving by and saw youths throwing stones against the cathedral. Our hosts told us the Church shouldn’t have this land. It was for someone else, but the Church had some contact with the government minister and got the land. As a Brazilian I think I know how they got it. We realized it’s a Brazilian church, part of a well-known made-in-Latin-America Brazilian denomination that is working in 100 countries. The front page of the Zambian newspapers told how some of the Brazilian pastors were being kicked out of the country.

Q: 'Brazilians go home.'

Exactly. We come to the table bringing our own successful experiences, but also bringing our own shortcomings, our disasters, our errors. When we come to the table today we need to come much more vulnerable.

I hope the Third Lausanne Congress in Cape Town will be this kind of table. That’s what some of us are dreaming of—a place where we start talking about our own journeys, our histories, our struggles and shortcomings, our painful experiences. When we do that we come much closer together.

It’s this table that brings us together, calling each other to fulfil our call to gospel ministry, calling each other to be good stewards of our possibilities and resources, but also calling each other to repentance.

Q: What do you do with those who aren’t ready for that kind of engagement?

There are two voices in me. First, I believe in the gospel. I believe in a continuous call into a new experience with the gospel. I believe in community because I believe in the gospel. I still get excited about the community that the Trinity is modeling to me. We need to continue to read the gospel, and talk to each other about that.

Second, I believe in the need for repentance. There are things in my life that I can understand only through pain. So as an older person I need to have patience that allows for younger generations to make their mistakes, and go through pain.

We should all be ready to listen to the gospel and repent.

Also, you don’t change systems just by talking to them. Don’t be naïve that if you have a good sermon and you pray well together everything will change.

Q: We need to be hardheaded about the difficulties of change.

And not only individually. Corporately.

For good and bad you are a product of yourself. Last time I went to Senegal I met Brazilian missionaries starting a simple restaurant, serving churrasco – Brazilian barbecue. In India, a Brazilian missionary working with Afghan refugees runs a soccer school with her Argentinean husband. It’s crazy. It’s beautiful.

It’s natural that we take our experience to other people: you take with you what you enjoy. I would say it is much better to take soccer than to take baseball. But I’m a Brazilian! We need to be aware of what we bring, but also to laugh about it, and hold it lightly.

Q: How have you worked through these issues in World Vision? You’re a global organization, with staff and money from many countries. What lessons about partnership have you learned?

The most remarkable lesson was to see World Vision US give up power. Every entity has one vote in the governing council: we in Brazil have one vote; the US that has 40% of the revenue has one vote. I think that was a powerful witness.

Q: How do you see partnership apply to churches which bypass agencies and make direct contact with people in other countries and send teams and funds directly. They just want to build a church or spend a week running a clinic. How do you help them see that they need to make time and space to listen?

If you don’t listen you will die alone.

Q: Is there a way to listen? A structure? An approach?

I am not much of a believer in listening techniques. I am more of a believer in a gospel that shapes you. The most important piece is where your heart is. Are you willing to listen?

If you go on a trip and encounter suffering and poverty and you don’t cry, something is wrong. We should stress that. When you feel strong and powerful, you do not listen. But there are moments of vulnerability. For example, if you are part of a rich middle class church in Brazil, and you encounter the poor in a favela, you ask why we have much and they don’t. Why do they suffer and we don’t?  If you have the gospel in your mind and heart, you will be hurt by the suffering of others.

We must also recognize that we dominate those in a vulnerable state who cannot say no to us when we offer all our programs and resources. We must listen first.

Try to find partners who critique you. It’s so dangerous only to have partners who want your resources and will do everything possible to make you happy while you are there. You also need partners who engage you and raise difficult questions, so that you establish real conversations.

Try to establish long-term relationships. Short-term missions should, if possible, be aligned to some kind of long-term commitment. In our mission history, the missionaries  I really value are those who went for life.

Dr. Valdir Steuernagel is Vice-President for Christian Commitments of World Vision International. He lives in Curitiba, Brazil.

 

 

Join the Conversation


Name
Country
Email (kept private)

Readers Respond



  • Suman Aghamkar, India Suman Aghamkar, India - 19 July 2010, 4:36 am
    I have apperciated what you have written about partenership in mission. We often use these words, partnership, networking but when it comes to actual doing we somehow hesitate to partner with others. It may be due to our selfish ambitions or worldy motives, but it remains there and nothing concrete takes place. The actual partnership takes place when we allow our selfish ambitions to be under the control of the Holy Spirit and give him room to work in our hearts.Partnership will help us to come together, understand each other and work together for His glory. But this not will not happen overnight.
  • Abraham J. Meintjes, South Africa Abraham J. Meintjes, South Africa - 6 May 2010, 2:15 am
    It remains a mystery to me that we have had a Gospel for 2010 years, and an uniterrupted gospel in South Africa for 358 years, and yet society and the world in general do not reflect a Godly character. The face of Africa rflects the character of its people and its leaders ... also mostly ungodly in its fruit. Yet, there are church services all over the world every Sunday. My mission call is to the Congo River. How can central Africa be so unreached and undiscipled through all these years. Then I do not want to mention the division between Christ-confessing denominations, and the enimosity between Pastors and Mission workers.
  • Alex Araujo, USA Alex Araujo, USA - 29 March 2010, 2:19 pm
    Hi Cody, I did go to your blog site and read your thoughts on the Biblical reason for partnering. I am so glad you took us to Eph. 4, as there is no stronger statement of our oneness, all of us globally, in Christ, and the very important and practical application of the gifts given to each for the benefit of the whole.
  • Proshanta Kumar Roy, Bangladesh Proshanta Kumar Roy, Bangladesh - 25 March 2010, 10:01 pm
    I would like to join the conversation.Pl add me your conversation. I am apastor from bangladesh. Proshanta
  • L-Arredondo, Mexico/USA L-Arredondo, Mexico/USA - 15 March 2010, 11:26 pm
    Dr. Valdir , parabens! goste de mais de sua visiao. I will like to take this long term relationship suggestion to a deeper dialogue. Could we dream about being more intentional about partnering with those in a position that together we could reach more effectively the people in the 10/40 window. For example, Western church partnering with a Guatemalan church to unite gifts and resources to "plant" a church in a Muslim city where we could send 2-3 families there to evangelize. It would be much easier to send 2-3 Guatemalan families instead of 1 family from the western church, smaller cultural bridges to cross, smaller complexities (political etc.) I can go on forever & w/ examples.. this concept has been mildly touched in 2004 conclusion of partnering together and the evaluation on the "two thirds church" and most recently by Samuel Escobar in a response in the "whole gospel, whole church and whole world" Hope to stir more dialogue in this direction.
  • Samuel Orkar, Nigeria Samuel Orkar, Nigeria - 15 March 2010, 3:49 pm
    I appreciate your last statement that we should have partners who critique us, I believe that as our partners visit our fields on short-Term missions and understand what we are are doing, they will know how to really partner with us.
  • Georges Houssney, Lebanese American Georges Houssney, Lebanese American - 7 March 2010, 10:45 am
    Please visit these sites to learn about ministry to Muslims and a biblical approach to missions: http://engagingislam.org http://biblicalmissiology.org
  • Georges Houssney, Lebanese American Georges Houssney, Lebanese American - 7 March 2010, 10:43 am
    What makes partnership difficult on the field are the conflicting approaches brought by "experts" whose heads are filled with preconceived theories. The Kenyon pastor is right that Western missionaries should first listen and learn. That can take a loooooong time, weeks, months and even years. They need to begin by coming under the local, national church become active members without a position. When the time comes they will find themselves more understanding and more effective in their work. I know a friend who was under a local church 2 years before the leaders asked him to lead a youth ministry. He did not impose his views. They recognized his gifts and asked him to use them. This true partnership.
  • CD, U.S.A. CD, U.S.A. - 6 March 2010, 9:31 pm
    We are still in the developing stage - about what it means being in " partnership in mission." That is why it is good discussion topic. -my perspective. *Few things I learned in "partnership in mission" over the years. -You do not impose your programs to others. -Primary focus should not be on money.
  • Robert Winkler Burke, Reno, Nevada USA Robert Winkler Burke, Reno, Nevada USA - 18 February 2010, 5:43 pm
    What is rich? What is poor? The cheap way to be rich, is preach prosperity give-to-get. The rich way of the soul is to learn Western Enlightenment. What is Western Enlightenment? It is Greek-Jewish-GothicChristian wisdom. It is a tragic view of the world that man is sinful, yet capable of great works, yet needing verification. The therapeutic world view is liberal, is prosperity-greed/rapture-fear/prophetic jabberwocky insanity of some sort. This insanity always reflects itself in the crazy belief in some sort of unobtainable utopia. Utopias are always lies. Always. See: www.inthatdayteachings.com, a Rosetta stone of answers regarding the problems with broadcast Christianity.
  • Cody C. Lorance, USA Cody C. Lorance, USA - 15 February 2010, 1:37 pm
    This is a powerful statement, "It's not me who needs money. It's us together." It seems to me that unless your relationship can transcend the sense that one party is giving money (or whatever) to another so that the recipient can do "his" work/ministry, no genuine partnership can be developed. Partnership, it seems, implies that there is an "ours" to the work. Of course, as Niringiye has written, it is ultimately God's mission. But in our relationships we also have to arrive at a sense that the work is ours together. If it is as much yours as it is mine, then we move beyond donations and charity to genuine partnership.
  • Cody C. Lorance, USA Cody C. Lorance, USA - 15 February 2010, 1:11 pm
    Thank you for this contribution. I especially appreciate the dismissal of merely pragmatic motivations for partnership as essentially inadequate and instead the emphasis on a theological impetus rooted in the doctrine of the Trinity. A more thorough theological/biblical rationale must be provided however. I've provided fuller reflection here http://ow.ly/17BbB
  • Nims, Kenya Nims, Kenya - 15 February 2010, 4:55 am
    I have been curious about the South African congress this year. I have just done a search on the term 'Somali' and found only one entry made by Zac Niringiye. Somalia is in international news a lot for the wrong reasons. What plans does the Lausanne congress have for this peopel group? I am one of a growing number of Christians in this area and would be excited to hear more about initiatives heading in the direction of the Somalis.
  • Pr. James Kibowe, Uganda Pr. James Kibowe, Uganda - 2 February 2010, 9:37 am
    This is a great opportunity for me and perhaps with the rest of the team. Having a wonderful God ordained time and day to share experiences, listen to the Father communicating to our spirits and souls, This requires a deeper understanding, and that God will desire a great level of contriteness and humility right from the bottleneck of the vision bearer then to the rest of the team. From the little experience i have, it is quite clear that He the Heavenly Father desired right from predestination to communicate great strategies us on thow He can use us to reachout men of different diverties in different nation settings. A shout to all brothren is to commit ourselves to His will and to have a vibrant ear committed to listening even to the minute, humble voice, and great divine direction will spring from there and will be visible and clear. Blessings
  • Alex Araujo, USA Alex Araujo, USA - 30 January 2010, 4:31 pm
    Thanks, Becky. Yes, Zach Niringiye is one of the clearest thinkers on these issues that I have seen.
  • Becky Stephen, U.A.E. Becky Stephen, U.A.E. - 28 January 2010, 9:02 pm
    Alex, you asked me to elaborate. I've been pondering how to do that in a way that communicates in a few words on e-paper. Today I stumbled upon this interview. http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2006/july/31.32.html?start=1 I should have known Bishop Zac has already said what I think needs to be said about the table - though he calls it by a different name. Becky
  • Eldy Emilsa Ordòñez Barillas., Guatemala. Eldy Emilsa Ordòñez Barillas., Guatemala. - 26 January 2010, 11:52 am
    Es impresionante el impàcto que tienen los creyentes cuando trabajan en unidad, en armonìa, en interdependencia, pues es parte del diseño que Dios creò, y cuando actuamos en base al proyecto de Dios, actuamos en verdad y somos libres. Pues la escritura nos dice que la verdad nos harà libres. Dios ha puesto personas en todo el mundo que tienen capacidad, que tienen amor genuino, que estàn dispuestos a dar la vida por otros y agregarle valor cada ves màs a otros, que han sido regenerados, que han tenido un encuentro genuino con Dios y espero que èste congreso històrico traiga mucho fruto para la salvaciòn de los que no conocen a Jesucristo. EStamos en el tiempo, Dios nos ha dado el momento de actuar y las naciones unidas para trabajar juntas y dar cumplimiento a la Gran Comisiòn, es una potencia que nadie puede frenar. Dios bendiga al moviumiento Lausana y la Asociación para la MIsiòn.
  • Skip Garmo, USA Skip Garmo, USA - 24 January 2010, 8:10 pm
    Character is at the core, isn't it?! The greatest problems in partnerships seem to be caused by character compromises. Likewise, the best solutions have Christlike character at their core. Among the good news is that character can be cultivated. Furthermore, as followers of Jesus Christ we have not only higher standards and higher motivation but higher enablement: the Holy Spirit. Character needs to be deliberately and saliently included in ministry partnership formation.
  • Traude Deitigsmann, Germany Traude Deitigsmann, Germany - 24 January 2010, 11:42 am
    Hi Ruth, thank you so much for your good thoughts. For me it is very important to communicate a high appreciation to every person involved in the partnership. Every poor fellow, too! That leads to build up trust. I am fully aware that this needs God's love and attention through all our being. Called to be servants, that is an important key, yes! The problems are in the heart, yes! Thanks a lot!
  • Traude Deitigsmann, Germany Traude Deitigsmann, Germany - 24 January 2010, 11:42 am
    Hi Ruth, thank you so much for your good thoughts. For me it is very important to communicate a high appreciation to every person involved in the partnership. Every poor fellow, too! That leads to build up trust. I am fully aware that this needs God's love and attention through all our being. Called to be servants, that is an important key, yes! The problems are in the heart, yes! Thanks a lot!
  • Barre Flynn, United States Barre Flynn, United States - 23 January 2010, 6:46 pm
    I think it is human nature to want to do it our way. The Gospel is a proposal to Love our Neighbor. If Love means to serve the interested of others relentlessly, it starts with listening and becoming involved with the people we serve. Psalm 139 says that we are all wonderfully and fearfully made. In our effort to serve the interests of others we must take the time to discover what God made wonderful about these people. At the foot of the cross the ground is level. When we elevate ourselves above others we diminish the possibility of loving and serving. In the midst of Love and the desire to serve most of our pride will disappear and the community will become solid. At the same time we nailed Christ to the cross demonstrating we often don't embrace the command to love and serve. That is why we have such a difficult time being a community of believers and why the Gospel is minimized and degraded.
  • Kaisen, USA Kaisen, USA - 23 January 2010, 12:38 pm
    "they are our co-creators" What does Callanta mean by this? Where does this idea come from?
  • Nathaniel V Nkosi , of origin[South Africa] currently USA Nathaniel V Nkosi , of origin[South Africa] currently USA - 20 January 2010, 1:12 pm
    THE CHURCH 0F JESUS CHRIST HAS, FOR 2000YEARS, OPERATED/CONDUCTED BUSINESS W-I-T-H-O-U-T THE CURRICULUM FOR M-A-K-I-N-G D-I-S-C-I-P-L-E-S according to the Great Commission [which is STATED in Mat 28:19,20 and AMPLIFIED in Mark 16:15; Luke 24:47; John 20:21; Acts1:8 ; Eph.4:11-16 and particularly Luke 6:40] The indisputable evidence is the +90%biblical illiteracy/infancy in every local church of every denomination in the Global Village. NOW THE LORD COMMANDS " LET MY PEOPLE G-R-O-W!"
  • Tom Keppeler, USA Tom Keppeler, USA - 18 January 2010, 8:06 am
    Table fellowship is indeed relational and what do you do at a meal? Among other things, you share, you listen, you converse and hopefully you learn. Is the operative question necessarily "who is calling the shots"? I have learned in my work and interactions with brothers and sisters from other cultures is that because of cultural and worldview differences, we bring different sets of questions to a problem or issue-- and we are the richer and (and hopefuly wiser) as my Congolese brother will ask a question or bring a perspective that would not occure to me or my German colleauge because of either our cultural, personal and worldview orientations. Thus listening and learning are key to coming to the table... and then we trust that God's Spirit will show us the path ahead.
  • joelmangbikcung, Myanmar( Burma) joelmangbikcung, Myanmar( Burma) - 17 January 2010, 3:51 am
    I am happy to meet you all. Get help me to keep contact you all and share me your mission .
  • Alex Araujo, USA Alex Araujo, USA - 14 January 2010, 1:37 pm
    Andy, thank you for your personal and real example of a different way to understand "the table". I like the imagery provoked by your comment. It usggests a contrast between a board room table and a dining room table. Besiness can be conducted at a meal table, but it is not the reason for that table to exist. Out of relationship will flow more appropriate parnership.
  • Grace Samson, South Africa Grace Samson, South Africa - 13 January 2010, 10:50 am
    1 Cor 8:1-2 talks about the fact that "Knowledge puffs up, but Love builds up"...Interesting how we choose our associations, based on the perception of "being more effective" and so bent on wanting to see results "for God". We need more space to "embrace" one another without "pay offs" or ministry rewards, not to say that those are not important. If the premise is different, we may still arrive at results, if not better...we need to stop suspecting our motives, fight to restore trust and stop "give and take" in our relationships.
  • Antonia Leonora van der Meer, Brazil Antonia Leonora van der Meer, Brazil - 13 January 2010, 7:38 am
    Dear friends, I like the article and several responses. Yes, money is still important and necessary but it should not give the power to decide, we should look more to wisdom and listen to those who "only" have wisdom, faith and experience, and no tecnological or economical power. I very much like Becky Stephen's comment. May the Lord give us hearts willing to learn and to share... Tonica
  • Andy Sodestrom, USA Andy Sodestrom, USA - 12 January 2010, 2:22 pm
    I think we need to consider the nature of the "table" we are using in this conversation. We began a relationship/partnership with a Chinese congregation in our community a few years back. I clearly remember the Chinese pastor telling me one day, that before we can be partners we must be friends, and before we can become friends we must eat together. We began having lunch together regularly (which is good because I love Chinese food) and over several months we became close friends. Our partnership has grown to planting a church in China, and currently we are opening a Chinese school here in our community. His wisdom invited me to the relational table, money is just a tool, very far down the priority list, and decisions are worked out together based on a common bond in Christ, and mutual love and respect. The table is very important, but it is relational in nature.
  • Alex Araujo, USA Alex Araujo, USA - 11 January 2010, 2:12 pm
    Becky, you raise important points. 1) who sits at the head of the table and has to power to invite others? 2) ow much does the table really matter? I would love to hear you expand on those two items. You and other readers might appreciate an on-going dialogue concerning the prevailing mission paradigm and the need for it to be replaced with another that is easier to link with Scriptures. I invite you to check our the blog site www.sailingfriends.wordpress.com for a full discussion of this topic. Thank you for your comments. Alex
  • Becky Stephen, U.A.E. Becky Stephen, U.A.E. - 10 January 2010, 11:38 pm
    "…where wisdom is the ticket to the table…" Alex, I couldn’t have said it better myself. But I wonder if this can ever truly happen. The problems inherent in and at the “table” – can they be overcome before Christ comes to set all things right? After all, who defines “wisdom”? No one seated at the table thinks they’re a fool. And few are foolish enough to tell the truth to those who sit at the head of the table – to those who, whether they’re aware of it or not, have the power to invite, to promote, to fund, to ignore, to sanction, and even to destroy the reputation and work of others. Perhaps the problems lie deeper – not just with who gets to the table and how, but with the very constructs and beliefs that push us to think that the table matters. Maybe it’s the sisters and brothers who, unaware that the table exists, are the wise ones, doing the works of Jesus and speaking the words of Jesus in the world in ways that will matter the most in the end.
  • Martha Rocha, BRAZIL Martha Rocha, BRAZIL - 9 January 2010, 8:59 pm
    GRAÇA E PAZ Primeiramente desejo a todos um 2010 de Vitórias e Salvação! Gostaria de obter mais informações sobre o CONGRESSO DE EVANGELISMO de 10/2010. Saiba que existe um povo aqui em Penedo/AL/Brasil orando por vocês. Em Cristo.
  • Alex Araujo, USA Alex Araujo, USA - 6 January 2010, 1:06 pm
    I like Nigel's restatement of the money issue: it needs to be brought back way down the list of proprities. Currently money has too much say in how mission strategies and activites are shaped and implemented. This inevitably shifts weight to the opinions of those of us who have more of it, even in those situations when others with less money may have a better idea or insight from the Lord. We actually can, if we want to, restore the proper balance. Shall we do it?
  • Nigel Spencer, U.K. Nigel Spencer, U.K. - 6 January 2010, 4:41 am
    I particularly valued the comments regarding Community vs Cooperation, the basis of true partnership being family, or personal relationship which builds and maintains trust. I don't agree that the last thing the world needs is money, but I do agree that money should come way down the list of priorities as we consider the future of our partnerships. At present, I am confronting the issue in relation to a cross-cultural partnership with friends in Moldova and Azerbaijan. It's only too easy to say money shouldn't be important when a partner is facing dire struggles in supporting a family and ministry at the same time. But the money given can poison the partnership rather than feed it.
  • Alex Araujo, USA Alex Araujo, USA - 5 January 2010, 2:21 pm
    My thanks to both Valdir steuernagel and Zach Niringiye, men I deeply respect. Our money gives us influence in world missions in disproportion to our wisdom and discernment. A wise person from a poor country ofen has to sit at the decision table with a foolish person from a rich country. This disparity is only possible because the foolish can afford to be there. We need to create a forum where wisdom is the ticket to the table, so that, regardless of riches, the discussion can be productive. As Zach says above, "We will not hide that we have money. But money is the last thing the world needs".
  • Lois Easley, United States Lois Easley, United States - 4 January 2010, 9:22 am
    Thank you for this eye-opening article! Great way to start Monday morning of the New Year. You have already been used by the Holy Spirit at deep levels.
  • Gordon Liston, Ireland Gordon Liston, Ireland - 31 December 2009, 2:09 pm
    Irish Mission Agencies Partnership www.imap.ie is made up of 25 mission agencies in Ireland working together to promote missions in Churches in Ireland.