Whole Gospel, Whole Church, Whole World
Whole Church, Whole Gospel, Whole WorldWe invite you to join the conversation on the topic whole Church, whole gospel, whole world. Christopher J. H. Wright lays the foundation for the conversation in his article Whole Gospel, Whole Church, Whole World. Selected writers respond:
Also see more on the topic from around the web. Join in the conversation by Adding Your Response. Enhancements ComingAn enhanced version of the Lausanne Global Conversation is coming in early 2010. Enter your email below to stay informed:
Christopher J. H. WrightThe Lausanne Covenant - substantially crafted by John Stott, includes the phrase: ‘evangelization requires the whole church to take the whole gospel to the whole world’.(1) One might argue that the three wholes embodied in this ringing phrase are hardly new, and go back to the Apostle Paul, if not to the patriarch Abraham himself. Let us look at what each means. The whole Church means all believers. The whole world means every man and woman. The whole gospel means all the blessings of the gospel. That is surely better than some missionaries taking some blessings of the gospel to some people in some parts of the world. But the three wholes also have more substantial, qualitative implications worthy of a Global Conversation. ‘The whole gospel’ The phrase suggests there may be some versions of the gospel that are less than whole - that are partial, deficient, less than fully biblical. First, we must give full weight to the spiritual realities of sin and evil, and we must evangelistically proclaim the glories of God’s redemptive achievement in the death and resurrection of Jesus. There would be no gospel without the cross. Indeed all blessings of the gospel derive from it, from personal salvation through Christ’s death in our place to the reconciling of all creation. The cross is at the heart of The Lausanne Movement, and the theme around which the Cape Town Congress revolves is ‘God in Christ, reconciling the world to himself’. The whole gospel must be drawn from the whole Bible. So we also have to ask how the social, economic, and political dimensions of the Old Testament relate to Christian mission. For centuries God revealed his passion against political tyranny, economic exploitation, judicial corruption, the suffering of the poor and oppressed, brutality and bloodshed. The laws God gave and the prophets God sent addressed these very matters more than any other issue except idolatry (they regarded such things as idolatry’s manifestations). Meanwhile the psalmists regularly cried out in songs of social protest and lament that we tend to screen out of our Christian worship. Unfortunately one can still detect a subtle sense that somewhere between Malachi and Matthew, all that changed. As if such things no longer spark God’s anger. This makes the alleged God of the New Testament unrecognisable as the LORD God, the Holy One of Israel. He has shed the priorities of the Mosaic Law, and the burden for justice that he laid on his prophets, at such cost to them. I find such a view of God and of mission to be unbiblical and unbelievable, if thewhole Bible is the trustworthy revelation of the identity, character and mission of the living God. The great Christ-centred, cross-centred redemptive truths do not nullify - rather, they complete - all that the Old Testament revealed about God’s commitment to the wholeness of human life, and redeeming his whole creation, for God’s own glory in Christ. As gospel people we must believe, live and communicate all that makes the gospel the staggeringly comprehensive good news that it is. I hope The Global Conversation will show multiple examples of this in action. The whole church In a quantitative sense, the expression ‘the whole church’ insists that mission is the task of all Christians, not just of the clergy or missionaries. The Lausanne Covenant talks of our being ‘called out’ to be ‘sent out’. The whole gospel is fully expressed only when the Church, Christ’s body on earth, faithfully fulfils the three roles Christ himself fulfilled on earth and for which he empowers us through his Spirit. We are called to a priestly role in worship and in prayer; to a prophetic role in declaring God’s message and priorities to his world; and to a servant role. When these are practised together we truly reflect God’s redeeming love for the world. Let’s look at dimensions of wholeness that will need to be included in the conversation. Missional church. What other kind of church is there, than the one that God created for mission? As someone said, ‘It’s not that God has a mission for his church in world; but that God has a church for his mission in the world.’ Scandalous lack of wholeness. The church is not just the delivery mechanism of the gospel. It is itself the product of the gospel, and is to be the living, visible, proof of the ethically transforming power of the gospel. The failures and abuses in the worldwide evangelical community are, in the literal New Testament sense of the word, a massive scandal—a stumbling block to the gospel being seen, heard and accepted. For that the only answer is repentance and reformation. The global Christian community. We need the whole world church to work with much greater levels of mutual cooperation and partnership.. There is a lot of listening to do, a lot of learning and un-learning. Our task across borders and boundaries is to do better, in Paul’s words, at accepting one another, counting others better than ourselves, and looking to their interests more than our own. A Global Conversation is a good place to start, though not to end. The whole world We can take the phrase ‘the whole world’ in a purely geographical sense. Nowhere is not the mission field, including our own country. There are still many unreached peoples, many languages that have no Scripture, many places where the name of Christ has never been heard. All these are urgent priorities for evangelistic mission. The ends of the earth are still waiting. And today the ends of the earth may also be our next-door neighbour, or the migrant in our midst. But we need to go deeper and consider other dimensions of our whole world: The world story. If our Bibles begin at Genesis 3 and end at Revelation 20, we are in danger of missing the whole point of God’s great story of the redemption of all creation. We will think only of saving sinners from the final judgment, not about living in the present creation as those who already bring the transforming values and prophetic truth of the new creation into the here and now. The world of worldviews, philosophies and faiths. What are the gods that surround us, and what is the Christlike and neighbour-loving response to those who worship them? We must not confine this to thinking only about world faiths. There are whole ideologies of secularism and atheism that need to be engaged, along with the idols of patriotism and hedonism, that are happily thriving on the worship of those who claim to be disciples of Jesus Christ. The world of creation, and our responsibility to the world which God has reconciled to himself through the cross (Colossians 1:20). If the planet was created by Christ, sustained by Christ and belongs to Christ as his inheritance, the least we can do is to look after it. Biblical stewardship of the earth should have been an evangelical theme long before the threat of climate change turned it into a matter of self-preservation. The world of globalization, and the public square. What kind of missional engagement should take place in relation to globalized economic trends and forces, massive migration, the cyber-world of the Internet and new technologies, and all that goes on in the marketplace and public square, in business, politics, education, media, journalism, medicine, and the whole world of human work? The world of violence, war, and terrorism. Apart from addressing the appalling scale of
death and destruction that these idols produce, do we not have a responsibility
also to challenge and expose their falsehood and to ask what gospel reality is implied
by Jesus when he said, ‘Blessed are the peacemakers’? I close by returning to the Congress theme verse in its rich and profound context. The Apostle Paul’s words in 2 Corinthians 5 18-19 are a wonderful summary of the theme of this article. “All this is from God, who through Christ reconciled us to himself and gave us the ministry of reconciliation; that God was reconciling the world to himself in Christ...” The reconciling, redemptive ministry of Jesus sends out those whom he has called out. And we are sent out to bring the whole gospel of God to the whole of God’s world. None of us can engage in every area. That is why God created the church with a multiplicity of gifts and callings, so that we can, as a whole church bear witness to the whole gospel in the whole world. I invite you to join the global conversation now at www.lausanne.org. May it generate more intelligent understanding and more focused action, as we work with God in his global mission. Chris Wright is International Director of the Langham Partnership International, and Chair of the Lausanne Theology Working Group.
|
-
CD, U.S.A. CD, U.S.A. - 6 March 2010, 8:26 pm History shows "the whole church - all Christians" will not respond to world mission. It sounds good in theory, though. Because, being involved in mission requires further commitment. Focus should be to raise up those who are willing to make that commitment. We need new breed of "mission Christians/workers" around the world.
-
GLABLEORDEPLE, Guam GLABLEORDEPLE, Guam - 2 March 2010, 10:27 pm The response to local and national disasters is great but it's a real shame that so many citizens take advantage of the sad situations. I mean everytime there is an earthquake, a flood, an oil spill - there's always a group of heartless people who rip off tax payers. This is in response to reading that 4 of Oprah Winfreys "angels" got busted ripping off the system. Shame on them! http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/08/19/crimesider/entry5251471.shtm l
-
Jon Westlund, USA Jon Westlund, USA - 15 December 2009, 12:06 pm Hi Christopher, I really appreciate what you have written. I am also encouraged by the comments that folllow it. You have touched a nerve in talking about the "whole." The nerve that you have touched is that of experience and things. My only concern is that the nerve of theology and words is not similarly touched. For some time, I have read others who talk of being healthy or whole in the church, but their audience is unsure where God's Word speaks of these things directly and not just indirectly by implication. I have tried to throw my energies into this project and I find it exhilarating. I hope you or someone like you can also contribute more on the basis for the choice of words alongside the reality and things behind those words. Yet again I want to say I am encouraged that you and others see the importance of the whole. In Christ, Jon
-
Pastor Faly Rajaonarison, MAYOTTE Pastor Faly Rajaonarison, MAYOTTE - 16 November 2009, 2:25 pm As a Pastor of one French Protestant Church in the Island Mayotte, I see that christians are constantly need to be remembered about their mission, so that they will not think that mission is just a task of clergy or missionaries
-
Clyde Taber, USA Clyde Taber, USA - 2 November 2009, 3:04 pm Chris Wright offers helpful categories and definitions on which we can build Spirit-led thinking that leads to Spirit-led action. I have not recently read the Lausanne statement, but I hope the concept of the "kingdom of God" is tightly woven into this important conversation. As I perused the article and responses, it feels overlooked. Note to editor: It would be helpful to have the post-dates of each entry included. It was not clear in what order the posts were made.
-
Joerg Dechert, Germany Joerg Dechert, Germany - 2 November 2009, 3:39 am "Unfortunately one can still detect a subtle sense that somewhere between Malachi and Matthew, all that changed." - Well, could it be that the challenge just got greater when the gospel moved out of its Jewish-only context (where the Old Testament focus of the Kingdom on justice and peace was prevalent and nonnegotiable) and into the Greek world? I'm not suggesting that Paul misrepresented the whole Gospel when addressing pagans (that would be most of us) - but the stakes are higher because the local body of believers now has to live out and incoporate justices and peace and reconciliation and protection of creation - since the context we live in does not now about Gods heart for these things from its own (Old Testament) tradition anymore. So "whole gospel" in the "whole world" does really need the "whole church" - meaning we cannot communicate the gospel as an isolated personal transaction for salvation only ...
-
Shakeel Samuel, Pakistan Shakeel Samuel, Pakistan - 31 October 2009, 11:46 pm I was in Tranform World South Asia conference on missions in Kathmandu, Nepal, as one of the delegate from Pakistan. It was very blessed conference and I was worried with the present bad security situation and critcle time from where the Christans in Pakistan are passing through, that has been revealed to me that in these situation God is there to provide oppotunities for evangelism, to show with your works and words that what is Gospel all about. I am interested to be a part of Lausane convention to listen and learn more while staying with the other believers, but it seems that I am to late. May God bless you all. Amen
-
Pastor Freddy Lusimba NSenga, South Africa Pastor Freddy Lusimba NSenga, South Africa - 31 October 2009, 10:01 am I am Pastor Missionnary from DRC in South AFrica. I am leading a Church with 200 + members and would like to participate at the Congress. We believe that this conference will help African People for evangelism. I will contribute more by grace of God.
-
COSMAS ILECHUKWU, Nigeria COSMAS ILECHUKWU, Nigeria - 29 October 2009, 11:01 am One of the greatest deterrant to christian witnessing has been the problem of a divided church, taken a divided gospel, to a divided world. This is the reality of our time. If Laussane III can figure out how to effectively get the whole church (whether roman catholic, orthodox, protestant, holiness, pentecostal, charismatic or what have you), to take the whole gospel(evangelical, the word of faith, prosperity, holiness, healing etc) to the whole world, it would have set the stage for the emergency of a new world that where love ethic of Christ will be the order of the day. This would demand a new theology as big as the world.
-
Lucien Jones, Jamaica Lucien Jones, Jamaica - 29 October 2009, 8:02 am This week i was very impressed with the Deutronomy call and that echoed by Jesus in Mark's Gospel, for us to love our neighbour as ourselves, as the second of the two great commandments. I suspect, but am not sure if it was C. S Lewis who gave birth to the observation that your neighbour - made in God's image - is the closest resemblance to God we will ever meet. The commandment and the observation then taken together suggests that each person we meet in life presents a rare opportunity for us to love our neighbour and witness to them the life of Christ, in its wonderful totality, living in us - "we always carry around in us the death of Christ so that the life of Christ may be in us" , said St. Paul to the church in Philippi. Perhaps we need to get back, or attend more closely, to that basic fact, and evangelism, involving the whole church and the whole gospel, will spread like wild fire across the whole world.
-
Elder Donna Motley Elder Donna Motley - 28 October 2009, 3:12 pm Lets really face the facts I believe that true meaning of WHOLE Gospel, Whole Church, Whole World has to be teach through the whole global world of Churches, organizations and not just the traditional sermons of what has been heard and seen around the world before this fire can really ignite, how many Christians leave their churches empower on world mission and world evangelism.
-
Tuvya Zaretsky Tuvya Zaretsky - 28 October 2009, 2:01 pm As a very young man, I was blessed by the sharp focus on evangelism that was at the heart of the 1974 Lausanne Congress on World Evangelisation.The theme then was "Let the Earth Hear HIS Voice." The Christian message is in the gospel - for which no one needs to be ashamed, because in it is the power of God unto salvation, to the Jewish people and to all the nations (Ro. 1:16-17). Considering how the "social, economic, and political dimensions of the Old Testament relate to Christian mission" is certainly important as one develops missiological strategies. However, it is the gospel message, the good news of salvation in the anointed redeemer for sin, that produces personal convertedness, spiritually transforms individuals and comes to characterizes the church.
-
Mel Lawrenz Mel Lawrenz - 28 October 2009, 8:08 am I've been a pastor for 30 years, and "the whole church bringing the whole gospel to the whole world" has been a faithful compass for us at Elmbrook Church. The idea of the whole church is an unattainable goal in this life (because of ever-present sin and fragmentation), but, on the other hand, the only goal worth aiming at. http://www.wholechurch.org
-
ifrahim Mathew ifrahim Mathew - 28 October 2009, 3:11 am The Participants of Cape Town should study & learn from the Taliban of Afghanistan.Their passion for their cause is surpassing Christian's passion for their cause.
-
Timothy Austin Timothy Austin - 27 October 2009, 10:29 pm Dr Wright has hit the nail on the head! Many local churches, especially in my country India are saved, satisfied and self-serving! They find that "the whole world" in "the whole church" and therefore "the whole Gospel" should be limited to the local church itself. They wear these comfortable blinkers and say that we are satified with our missionary work! No wonder para church organisations have sprung up, some church based while a number of others "independant" ideologically, philosphically and even financially of the church. Still, God in His mercy is extending His Kingdom even in our land.
-
Rev sunil Gaikwad Rev sunil Gaikwad - 27 October 2009, 9:47 pm i wish to attend the global conversation.
-
David Lyons David Lyons - 27 October 2009, 7:23 pm As brother Wright says, none of us can engage in every area. This highlights how desperately we need one another in all of our diversity of gifts, ministries, ethnicity, genders and cultures. We need one another to highlight corporate and individual blind spots. We need one another to share resources most effectively. We need those often deemed "less honorable" (1 Corinthians 12:23). And we need to LISTEN to one another. In some ways, that is what I most value in the Lausanne movement.
-
JoelMang JoelMang - 26 October 2009, 9:00 pm what would be your response in term of Pastor's deeply envolved in business for his livelihood and to manage the church as well. And then, could it be possible to have such a business being a Pastor in the church? The third one is , In a remote areas where there is no such a pastor but need to give Baptism without a pastor.. So, who will give Baptism and how it will be done? Please I need the biblical answear . Thanks
-
Joe Sanders Joe Sanders - 19 October 2009, 2:14 pm the three wholes are more important before - especially since we are in such a late season of human history and perhaps we are so much closer than before that God intervenes in a macro intensive manner. People are dying and going to hell.
-
Emmanuel M.Omeagu Emmanuel M.Omeagu - 16 October 2009, 7:39 am Louis Bush "10/40 window" is highly inspiring to any one interested in a wholistic or even call it agressive soul-winning that is devoid of church politics.We've realized that winning our world for Christ requires divine tacts and strategies not the conventional methods. When there seemed to be obstacles from religions we realized that children and youths are turning to Christ. I think love is the most of the issue and not just preachings and teachings that could be inhibited by ant-Christs. I think the time for much talking is getting over.The west has have to do more and has have to partner more with the third world countries' evangelists and mission agences to get this divine soul-winning project realized.
-
Nathan Clarke - Fourth Line Films Nathan Clarke - Fourth Line Films - 14 October 2009, 10:49 am James Reid Ross - I think you will find that "Love" plays a roll in the video that compliments the article.
-
Philip Spottswood Philip Spottswood - 14 October 2009, 6:44 am Louis Bush has challenged us to make the new focus of missions is the "4-14 window", by which he means that we must focus on evangelizing children and youth all around the world. God has given us an easy entry into the homes of most of these children through the provision of world-class on-line English language education leading to US accredited high school diplomas that non-US children can then use to get a post-secondary education in the many, many great colleges and universities in the US. In the last 500+ years Christians were building schools, hospitals, and providing other services as bridges to the Gospel. Now we have a much cheaper way to get into almost every home in the world. Consider how you can help promote world-class, online education to the children and youth God has called you to reach with the whole Gospel.
-
James Reid Ross James Reid Ross - 14 October 2009, 2:36 am Worthy goals but I didn't see the word "LOVE" anywhere in this article. "If we don't have love we have nothing" didn't our Lord sum the whole law in one word "LOVE" , love for the hungry children who have no food, no clean water, no shoes, no parents, no toys, victims of vicious unsaved men who use them to gratify their sexual desires girls and boys alike. Love for those afflicted by aids, and other incurable diseases. Mother Teresa like love to touch the untouchables. Christ love love love, for HE first loved us. Love James Reid Ross
-
Jason Jason - 14 October 2009, 1:40 am The emphasis in missionwork is still on the Third World, while Europe, the heart of early Christianity, lapses into Godless materialistic secular paganism. What a tragedy!
-
Ed Brown, Care of Creation Inc. Ed Brown, Care of Creation Inc. - 13 October 2009, 11:17 am "If the planet was created by Christ, sustained by Christ and belongs to Christ as his inheritance, the least we can do is to look after it..." is a good, logical statement - but does it go far enough? In defining the meaning of the cross earlier in the article, Dr. Wright says, "There would be no gospel without the cross. Indeed all blessings of the gospel derive from it, from personal salvation through Christ’s death in our place to the reconciling of all creation." If the end of God's redemptive plan is in fact the reconciliation of the cosmos (yes, that's the Greek for 'world' in the Lausanne theme verse) then caring for our little piece of that cosmos is not a 'least we can do' but one of the most important things we MUST do - for just like Christ's resurrection, caring for and even restoring creation now is a foretaste of future redemption and reconciliation.
-
Samuel Escobar Samuel Escobar - 12 October 2009, 4:31 pm Thanks Theodore Gill for remindings us of the IMC meeting in Tambaram and of John A. Mackay, that great Ecumenical-Evangelical theologian. A biography of Mackay will appear soon in the USA. The question posed by Ewald Seidel is very important but I do not have a clear, easy answer. May be special evangelistic efforts should be directed to heads of households, like in the book of Acts. That has been the patter for the incredible growth of the Philadelphia churches of the Gypsies in Spain, a true case of spontaneous expansion of the Gospel in the 20th century.
-
Ewald Seidel Ewald Seidel - 11 October 2009, 5:37 am I am presently in Odessa, Ukraine, having been invited to teach a course on "Christian Ministry: a biblical basis". I am also working on material "God's Mission: Our Mission". I happened to lay my hands on Samuel Escobar's book, "A Time for Mission" where he says that in the African context, evangelism must be directed towards whole families and possibly even clans. It should avoid the individualistic approach that is common in the West. My question is this: What then is the case of people from a Muslim background who come to Christ as individuals and find themselves at best isolated in their communities, or at worst persecuted and even killed in some cases. Muslims also see themselves as members of families and even tribes. How would a person like Samuel Escobar approach such a problem?
-
jt jt - 9 October 2009, 2:12 pm Carol, my heart resonated with your words. I've had a similar experience, spending four decades in this modern evangelical movement, then hearing about "the Eucharist", and the rest of the sacraments, my eyes were opened upon re-reading scripture. Amazing how many things jump off the page! I feel like it's my own "Emmaus Road" experience.
-
jaffray geddes jaffray geddes - 9 October 2009, 8:11 am The Gospel Commission is indeed a direction to proclaim it to the whole world but surely one needs to be 'In Christ' -and by that I mean under the revealed knowledge in Holy Writ empowered by the Holy Spirit? There are thousands nay, millions still under the yoke of'Law' following blindly traditions bereft of any knowlege of the New Covenant SET UP BY cHRIST IN HIS DEATH AND RESURRECTION, the very essence that needs proclamation to liberate one from the Old, the transforming fact that makes of one New. EVANGELIZING in this 'light' is certainly not as proclaimed by The Meyers,Hinns to mention a few. This is my opinion and by what I discern , and laying it alongside God's Word. amen. The article motivates this comment. An article on the grand scale of the Gospel.
-
Mike Padgett Mike Padgett - 8 October 2009, 11:23 pm How refreshing to read and be reminded of the total commision of the church! I will soon complete forty years in ministry and have been continually growing in my understanding of my part in the work of Jesus. I pastor a small church, by some standards, and am joyously content with our contribution both at home and abroad. I touch one life at a time and by the power of the Holy Spirit see Him effecting change in men, women, boys and girls. How I praise Him for allowing me to serve Him!
-
Lloyd A. Cooke Lloyd A. Cooke - 8 October 2009, 4:10 pm A seminal article by Chris Wright. Oh that the whole Church would awaken every member to its (their) responsibilities to the whole world, as seen so clearly throughout the whole Bible. Then the life and task of world evangelization would reach its completion overnight. This gospel of the Kingdom must be taken to all the world for a witness, and then shall the end come, because God will not shut out from His Kingdom and its blessings any of earth's people. May we all arise and complete the task.
-
Thom Hunter Thom Hunter - 8 October 2009, 10:11 am The tendency of the church in recent generations to look for numbers has made it easier to look for compatibles because they're easier to attract and to hold on to. However, this has left a huge number of un-churched, disenfranchised, hurting people who have the same inner desire for acceptance and peace as everyone else has. If the church does not look at those with social needs as equals, they will find someone somewhere who does . . . someone who does not have the truth in them about peace and eternal life. Discrimination takes many forms and Christians are certainly not free from it because of our biases, which we need to turn over to the Lord so they will not distract us. If there is anyone who is not good enough to be in our churches, then we have made our churches too good for our own good . . . or for God's. Thom http://thom-signsofastruggle.blogspot.com/
-
Carol Aucamp Carol Aucamp - 8 October 2009, 9:45 am As one who spent 28 years of my adult Chrsitian life at an evangelical, Bible teaching church without hearing a single sermon about God's heart for the poor, justice, and oppression, I wept with joy at Chris' article. Obviously I was spiritually blind myself, because in those 28years I read my entire Bible through at least 5 times without seeing God's heart for "the least of these". When God used a Christian brother to open my eyes to these matters, I once again reread my entire Bible and was ASTONISHED to see how much I had missed. It seemed I could now see God's heart regarding the poor, justice, and oppression EVERYWHERE - from the Torah laws to protect the poor to Psalms, Proverbs, and the prophets, especially Isaiah, Amos, and Micah, on through the gospels, especially Matthew and Luke (Mary's Magnificat, no less!) and Acts. Thank you Chris and CT. I agree with Stuart, "Send this article to your friends everybody!"
-
Paul Schryba Paul Schryba - 8 October 2009, 9:31 am A very good, evocative article. 'Christianity' has failed often, because it substitutes concepts and beliefs for lived existential reality. Concepts, beliefs and institutions can only point to the reality. The church that points to itself and its spoken doctrines; points to nothing at all. It is a challenge to live it.
-
Dick Wiedenheft Dick Wiedenheft - 8 October 2009, 9:10 am Just a follow up to Doug's contention that Paul never challenged the social issues of his day. In fact, a key part of Paul's gospel and his mission was that Gentiles be accepted as equal participants among the people of God. Thus, he argued strenuously that the gospel broke down the social discrimination between Jew and Gentile. Paul not only preached the gospel, but challenged God's people to live out the implications of the gospel which quickly impinge on social issues such as discrimination.
-
Jane Maire Jane Maire - 8 October 2009, 8:35 am While agreeing with the statement "what other kind of church can there be but missional", I would say that at this point in time it is a new call to the church in the western church to get back to an incarnational stance in mission that has been lost across the centuries where the church became the central institution that called the shots and waited for the rank and file to line up. Although generalisations are never true of every type, one can say that much of the church became an inward-looking institution, especially in evangelical circles, often unrelated to people outside the Church. One did evangelistic forays into the world rather than incarnational living alongside people where they were. So I don't think the term "missional" should be shot at. It's there to get us off our benches and back with the "bad" people who feel they're not good enough for church.
-
Jane Maire Jane Maire - 8 October 2009, 8:34 am While agreeing with the statement "what other kind of church can there be but missional", I would say that at this point in time it is a new call to the church in the western church to get back to an incarnational stance in mission that has been lost across the centuries where the church became the central institution that called the shots and waited for the rank and file to line up. Although generalisations are never true of every type, one can say that much of the church became an inward-looking institution, especially in evangelical circles, often unrelated to people outside the Church. One did evangelistic forays into the world rather than incarnational living alongside people where they were. So I don't think the term "missional" should be shot at. It's there to get us off our benches and back with the "bad" people who feel they're not good enough for church.
-
Theodore Gill Theodore Gill - 8 October 2009, 1:43 am The prescription for "the whole church taking the whole gospel to the whole world" antedates its 1974 usage by at least three or four decades. It was the motto of the 1938 conference of the International Missionary Council held in Tambaram, Madras, India, and was a favorite phrase of missiologist and Princeton Seminary president John A. Mackay who led the IMC in the late 1940s and 1950s. It is a shared legacy of the Lausanne Movement and the World Council of Churches, even if they sometimes seem to put it to different uses.
-
Ephrem Hagos Ephrem Hagos - 8 October 2009, 12:17 am What a perversion of the gospel of Christ! Today's gospel is, indeed, a perfect match to the "other gospel" complete with "another Jesus", "another spirit" just like Paul feared (2 Cor. 11:4).
-
M. Carril M. Carril - 7 October 2009, 6:10 pm The local church can never be divorced from the church universal. When we are in the midst of believers and worshipers of the true risen Christ, then there is the church invisible and yet in another way visible.
-
Peter Peter - 7 October 2009, 5:44 pm While I guess there is a "whole gospel," such a whole seems to be made up of at least three distinctive, or even distinct, parts: the gospel of the kingdom, the gospel of God and the gospel of Christ. While they no doubt overlap, I think we do ourselves a disservice of understanding them as simply being different names for the same thing, though each contributes to a collective whole.
-
Stuart Barnett Stuart Barnett - 7 October 2009, 4:57 pm Thanks you for publishing such an outstanding article. I can't remember when I last read something that so clearly defines what the whole gospel is about. We are called to be salt and light in all areas of society, not just preaching "the simple gospel". Send this article to your friends everybody!
-
Carluci Dos Santos, Latin America Mission Canada Carluci Dos Santos, Latin America Mission Canada - 7 October 2009, 2:12 pm Thank you, Chris for this article! Thanks for bringing us the call to repentance and reformation which is at the core of the gospel message, and echoes in prophetic voices throughout our history as is the case also of the Lausanne Covenant of 1974! The call to repentance cuts deeper than a call to liturgical or aesthetic changes in local churches or denominations. Truly, that call brings us to the cross as the place we meet Christ and one another. No, we are not called to be like the “postman.” Thanks for not leaving out Genesis 1 and 2 and Revelation 21 and 22, or the Prophets or the Psalmists to remind us of what the whole Gospel is, and what it means to the whole earth! Indeed, the King comes to collect the fruit of his vineyard: the fruit of repentance in every aspect of our daily lives and business (Isa. 7, Mat 21). May Lausanne Cape Town 2010 ignite us again!
-
Doug Doug - 7 October 2009, 2:03 pm Ironically the apostle Paul proclaimed the gospel in the midst of a corrupt Roman social system that included slavery and every form of abuse. Yet you don't hear him say anything to the church about being involved is social issues of the day. Why is that? His job was to preach the gospel and then let the gospel change society. The problem is we can't get unbelievers to be different than they are. We must preach the gospel and then the society changes.
-
JP JP - 7 October 2009, 1:20 pm Actually, this is a bad question on the poll. "My Church" is not the local congregation -- "My Church" should be Christ's worldwide Church. And thus, the question would be yes. But if you mean my local congregation, then it's equally a bad question because that is impossible. One local congregation cannot do a good job of evangelizing the whole world. These lame attempts at personalizing can fail badly when we're talking about significantly larger issues than the great and powerful "me."
-
pete Benson, editor UNITYINCHRIST.COM pete Benson, editor UNITYINCHRIST.COM - 7 October 2009, 1:19 pm I love your comment, Dakotahgeo, sadly, it is so true. I also think the quote of Ghandi is so true. Christians even dealing with Christians are often mean-spirited. Don't believe me, just take a stand as believing in an "Old Earth" amongst believers who believe in a "Young Earth", they'll tear you apart accusing you of destroying the innerrency of God's Word. We as believers must set one of the worst examples to the world imaginable, as Ghandi reflected.
-
Matt Stephens Matt Stephens - 7 October 2009, 1:13 pm Galen, do you have any idea what you're talking about? Try reading the whole New Testament, and perhaps throwing in a bit of common sense.
-
Galen Currah Galen Currah - 7 October 2009, 12:57 pm 'Jesus Christ NEVER came to start a "church" or "religion."' Well, Jesus did say, "I will build my church." Of course, we think we know what you mean: Jesus is, in fact, building a world-wide, creation-wide, eternal community, though neither a denomination nor a social institution.
-
jt jt - 7 October 2009, 12:56 pm Though i think the author asks some great questions, and ponders some possibly good answers, he doesn't tell us if whether by "whole gospel" he is hoping evangelicals (since most articles are aimed at that demographic movement) will return to biblical and traditional Christian teachings on the eucharist, confession, and other bedrock Christian concepts that have been completely lost in the modern Church of The Holy Comfort Zone. If "the church" were "The Church" again, and united as One Bride as was set out in the New Testament, we could offer the world a stonger, more cohesive message with real answers instead of a myriad of opinions and whims.
-
Dakotahgeo Dakotahgeo - 7 October 2009, 12:45 pm As a semi-retired* minister, I could not agree with Willie and Jorge more. I remember so well the quote by Ghandhi, "We love your Jesus, but please protect us from his followers." Christianity has become the most degrading, insulting, blasphemous, religion in the world because Jesus Christ NEVER came to start a "church" or "religion." He came to save all people from sin and death, unto eternal life. What most Christians do today is to re-condemn people back to hell... for good! I've seen this demonstrated both as a Christian minister and a hospice Chaplain, and it is not pretty. If we want to get away from the man-made aspect of Christianity, feed the hungry, clothe the naked, and do all one can to see that Christ DOES care for them. Then they will listen to you. And above all, don't "attach strings" to your gifts! * ministers, pastors, chaplains, et al, really don't ever retire. We just have more time on our hands!
-
Charles Powell Charles Powell - 7 October 2009, 12:44 pm This became an overpowering sense of immediacy, when I realized that this is not optional. He did not say, "If you feel like it, or if you feel led to go and make disciples." What He gave us was a personal and corporate command that has only one answer, "Yes, Sir!" Coach Charles http://cli.gs/rBB5ee
-
Willie Krischke Willie Krischke - 7 October 2009, 10:31 am Jorge Romero - which part is "contrary to other religions in the world?" Religion is rife with personal agendas and schisms, violence and factions and splits. Shiites and Sunnis, the Hindu caste system... All religions.
-
Jorge Romero Jorge Romero - 5 October 2009, 8:28 am What I see is that contrary to other religions in the world, we (the ones having the Gospel) have so many personal agendas, and specially in America the Gospel has become an awful interprise. God help us.










